A Style Nobody can Deal with: Politics, Style and
the Postindustrial City in Hip Hop
Tricia Rose
After reading this article by Tricia Rose, my head was actually pounding. The way she tried to define the meanings of hip hop and rap completely boggled my mind. She would use words that I have never even heard of to describe something that seemed so easy to relate with. I needed to have dictionary.com on my tab at all times, or else I would have been completely lost. For example, her opening sentences frustrated and confused me to the point where I almost did not want to continue reading the article : "Emerging from the intersection of lack and desire in the postindustrial city, hip hop manages the painful contradictions of social alienation and prophetic imagination....attempts to negotiate the experiences of marginalization , brutally truncated opportunity...". Is she serious? I didn't want to have to be a rhode scholar to understand this article.
One definition she had for hip hop that I thought was relatable was "..hip hop combines elements of speech and song, of dance and display to call into being through performance new identities and subject positions". She is trying to involve the reader with the way hip hop was brought into the culture and media. In the article, Rose teaches us that rap and hip hop have been passed down from the earlier Afro-Caribbean and Afro-American cultures to make it into what it is today. She specifically talked about the social and political terrain in NYC around the 1970s that brought about the emergence and early reception of hip hop. She talks about how this music has helped decrease "long-standing racial and gender-based forms of discrimination. Being from New York, it was interesting to read about the South Bronx and how it was dubed the 'home of hip hop culture'. Rose showed us the Blacks, Jamaicans, Puerto Ricand and other Caribbean people were living in the devistating region of the South Bronx. "Negative local color in popular film exploited the devastation facing the residents of the South Bronx and used their communities and a backdrop for social ruin and barbarism." The people living there then answered back in the form of art and song through rap and hip hop.
I think part of Rose's arguments and claims stand up in 2008, but in a differnt way. When I look at rap/hip hop, there are artists who take it very seriously and and proud of the work they bring into the community, and then there are those who broadcast women in such a negative way and are only in it for the fame, the expensive cars, the mansions and of course the money. One quote I found to back up my opinion that her arguments don't match up to 2008: "Even as todays rappers revise and redirect rap music, most understand themselves as working out of a tradition of style, attitude and form which has critical and primary roots..." I don't necessarily agree with that quote from Rose. If I were to turn on HOT97 (a NY rap/hiphop station) 9 times out of 10 I would be listening to a catchy tune about demoralizing and degrating women. One recent song that people cant get enough of "Superman that Hoe"...I'm sure the majority of people don't know what that term means, yet they sing and bounce to it in their cars, on their ringtones or at the clubs. My friend recently told me what it means, and I was soooo disgusted. My little nephew thinks he's some kind of 'gangster', walking around with a little 'swagger', thinking he's tough and singing these pointless songs. Meanwhile, my sister and brother-in-law think it's hilarious. I want to strangler her! He's 11yrs old and doesn't need to be listening to rap songs that talk about having sex with 'hoes' and have explicit language.
I understood the point she was trying to get across and I found it very interesting to learn about the history of the culture, but her use of over-dramatic words and her constant run-on sentences really threw me off with this article. I just found it hard to follow. Although, I did enjoy her argument and I thought her piece was well rounded and developed.
